Subscribe by Email
-
Is John Waldorf a Deadbeat Dad or Victim of Harsh NJ Alimony Laws?
December 23, 2012
-
Is a Spouse ever entitled to “Permanent Alimony” in N.J.?
March 2, 2013
-
DIVORCED PARENT PAYING FOR COLLEGE CAN DEMAND TO SEE THE REPORT CARD
April 20, 2011
-
Do you agree with Obama about using Lethal Force against American Citizens?
February 5, 2013
-
Larry the N.J. Lawyer’s Cogitations is Coming to an End
April 21, 2013
-
Is CISPA Friend or Foe?
April 19, 2013
-
Supremes Strike Down Non-consensual Blood Testing in DUI Cases
April 18, 2013
-
When does a Common Carrier owe a Heightened Standard of Care to a Passenger?
April 11, 2013
affidavit of merit
attorney ethics
cell phone right of privacy
concussions
current events
discovery
discovery rule
Donald Trump
dram shop act
DUI
DWI
ethical website content
evidence
expert witness
F.C.C.
freedom of speech
free speech
George Carlin's 7 Dirty Words
He v Miller
Judicial Ethics
Judicial Ethics Violation
Lawyer's friend request to party represented by counsel
legal malpractice
life insurance proceeds after divorce
medical marijuana
mortgage foreclosure
municipal court
navy seals kill Bin Laden
NJ Consumer Fraud Act
NJ uninsured motorist statute
Obama-care
passenger in own uninsured car
reconsideration of He decision
Right of privacy
shield law
speech by PM of Pakistan
sports violence
teacher tenure
The Donald's defamation suit dismissed
the F-word
trial judge allowed to substitute his feel for case for jury verdict
using cell phone as a homing device
US investigation of Google business practices
website content unethical
Wrongful Death Act

NO SHIELD FOR BLOGGER, N.J. COURT RULES
by admin on June 8, 2011 in N.J. Legislation, N.J. Supreme Court
The N.J. Law Journal reports:
Most bloggers aren’t journalists, at least when it comes to availing themselves of a New Jersey statute that gives reporters a privilege against revealing their sources, the state Supreme Court says.
Tuesday’s ruling, in the ominously named Too Much Media LLC v. Hale, A-7-10, means that blogger Shellee Hale, of Washington State, can be made to reveal her sources for her allegedly defamatory Internet postings about a Freehold software company. But the Court went further in the widely awaited decision, rejecting arguments by media and civil liberties advocates for a broad reading of the Shield Law and putting most of the blogosphere outside its protection.
Read more…
Too Much Media LLC v Hale-A710
N.J. Shield Law
Share this:
Tags: bloggers, defamation, definition of journalist, reveal sources for comments, shield law
About admin
Subscribe by e-mail to Larry the NJ Lawyer's Cogitations Blog
Enter your e-mail address in the space below and click on "submit." Thank you!
Related Posts: